Why Color Matching Remains a Bottleneck
So, it’s 2025 and you’re wondering why color matching is still such a struggle. Well, the issue isn’t just one thing. It’s many things, including:
- Lack of skilled operators
- Prior, non-documented modifications to files
- Inconsistent results across different presses, shifts, or even countries
- Lack of standardization
It’s no wonder color matching today continues to consume time, resources, and patience.
Before we talk about the solution, let’s take a quick tour through the chaos it’s designed to fix.
Educated Guessing
Currently, matching a printed sample isn’t about precision, it’s about educated guessing.
Operators must spot the differences as best as they can while tweaking color curves manually before they send another test to press.
Sometimes it works. And sometimes it doesn’t.
And if the original file’s been altered along the way? Good luck. You’re basically reverse engineering a mystery print.
Iterations & Reprints = Wasted Time
Most teams go through multiple iterations before getting close to the original sample. That’s hours of manual adjustment, often with the press standing still, waiting.
And while that’s happening, the production schedule gets tighter. Your three-job shift just became a one-job panic. Multiply that across a week, and you’re bleeding time, materials, money, and morale.
It’s Not Just a Prepress Problem
The ripple effects hit everyone. The press operator is frustrated. Production managers scramble to reshuffle jobs. And the business? Delays, inefficiency, and worse—potentially missed deadlines that impact customer trust.
All of this from a color match gone sideways.